• Consultations
  • Personal Trainer Test
  • Classes
  • Resources
  • Shop

Joe Cannon, MS

Honest Answers: Health, Wellness, Fitness, Nutrition

  • Home
  • About
  • My Books
  • Contact

Viagra and Skin Cancer? What The Research Says

By Joe Cannon 5 Comments

Driving home one night I heard a radio show discuss the possibility that Viagra may be linked to skin cancer (melanoma). That's a new one! I was intrigued, so I made a mental note to check into it when I got home. Sure enough, there is some research on this so what I want to do is look only at the research and in doing so, hopefully, give men a better idea of whether or not they may have a problem.

Viagra Skin Cancer Research

To find the answer if there is a connection I searched  clinical databases for these words:

  • Viagra skin cancer
  • Sildenafil skin cancer (Sildenafil is the scientific name for Viagra)
  • Viagra melanoma (melanoma is the medical name for skin cancer
  • Sildenafil melanoma

I found the following relevant human study:

A 2014 study titled, Sildenafil use and increased risk of incident melanoma in US men: a prospective cohort study. This study began in 2000 and lasted 10 years. It involved 25,848 men who were part of another study called the Health Professionals' Follow-up Study, which has been going on since the late 1980s.

Only men with no cancers were included in this study. Men were quizzed ahead of time for whether they used Viagra or not. Some men used it and others did not at the start of the study. Every 2 years during the study, the men filled out surveys about how their health was going. This included questions about cancer development and the use of Viagra.

At the end of this study, the researchers identified:

  • 142 cases of melanoma
  • 580 cases of squamous cell carcinoma
  • 3030 basal cell carcinoma

They noted that Viagra use at the start of the study was significantly associated with more melanoma – the most serious type of skin cancer.

Conversely, Viagra was not associated with squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma.

Interestingly, the researchers also noted a significant increase in melanoma in men who – at any time in the past -had used Viagra.

In men who had ED but did not take Viagra, there was no significant increase in melanoma rates.

What I was unclear about with this study is how many of the men who got skin cancers also used sunscreen? It would be interesting to skin cancer/Viagra alongside whether or not men who got skin cancer also used a sunscreen.

Problems With The Study

Before men freak out about this study need to know a few things:

     1. This study didn’t “prove” Viagra caused skin cancer. Rather, the researchers tracked men over 10 years. They noticed an association between Viagra and skin cancer. An association and “proof” are not always the same thing.

     2. Out of 25,848 men, only 142 men got melanoma. Looking at it this way, that makes the risk pretty low – although I admit melanoma is nothing to mess around with. It is serious cancer.

In 2015, another study was published on erection drugs and skin cancer. This study tracked people from 2006-2012 and compared PD5 inhibitor drugs (Viagra, Levitra, Cialis) to melanoma cases (skin cancer).

Of the 4065 men who developed melanoma, 11% (435 men) had filled prescriptions for Pd5 inhibitors. In the control group, who did not use such drugs,  only 1713 men (8%) developed skin cancer. The risk of skin cancer seemed similar to whether the men used Viagra (Sildenafil ) , Levitra  (Vardenafil) or Cialis (tadalafil).

Problems With The Study

The men who took erection drugs tended to be different than those who did not. Specifically, the men tended to make more money and have a higher education level. This leaves open the possibility that skin cancer may be related to the men doing other things (lifestyle factors) that may have contributed to melanoma.

In other words, this study, like the one above, does not prove PD5 inhibitors are linked to skin cancer. Rather, it just shows an association. Just because two things are associated does not always have to mean they are connected.

 

What About ED Supplements?

Walk into the back of almost any vitamin store and you will find several dietary supplements that are touted to improve erections. Often these have interesting names that subtly give the impression they increase hardness.

Right now there is no evidence linking dietary supplements for ED to melanoma. The ingredients in these supplements tend to work differently than Viagra too, which makes me think they probably would not have the same outcomes.

That said, men should know that several ED supplements have been found to be spiked with Viagra, Levitra and/or Cialis. These drugs are not listed on the labels. the FDA often finds these after the products are sold.

It's my experience that male enhancement products are often the sketchiest / shadiest category of dietary supplements. Since 99% of the ingredients have no proof, and because some might be hidden ED drugs, I advise men to steer clear of them.

See the Supplements/Viagra review for more insights.

What Can Men Do?

Talking about ED can be a touchy subject for men. I get that. That said, because skin cancer is such a terrible disease (I had a cousin die from it), I think it’s a good idea to get a yearly check-up by a dermatologist. They can look all over the body and see if anything is going on. It would only take a few minutes. Just Google “dermatologist and your zip code” and they will all show up. By now, I'm sure every dermatologist and esthetician is up on the “Viagra skin cancer study” so I recommend men bring it up to them to see what they think. It goes without saying but, Viagra or not, men should wear a sunscreen when they go outside, preferably one with at least an SPF of 50 such as this brand that I use.

Viagra And Melanoma: Yes or No?

Right now, I think its a “wait for more research” thing. While the first study reviewed here is actually based on previous research that showed that Viagra appeared to activate genes that played a role in the spread of melanoma, the findings of the 2nd study seem to – on the surface make some think there is a connection. Still, both studies seem to only show there may be a connection. Whether or not there is a direct link will need better studies.

What do you think?

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Filed Under: Health

Comments

  1. devodude says

    April 28, 2015 at 6:49 pm

    I wonder who thought there was some association between Viagra and skin cancer in the first place? No pun intended, but it seems like a stretch. There are so many other “good reasons” to avoid Viagra, if possible.

    This may be a bit off topic, but I’ve noticed that Eli Lilly and Company have been pushing Cialis as a treatment for BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia) when ED is also involved. I’ve gone to their official website and can’t find information as to why or how this drug would work for BPH. My urologist used to give me “Flowmax” which apparently relaxes the muscles around the prostate.

    I also have a pathetic G.P. who clearly states there’s no difference between Viagra, Cialis and Levitra. Not that he wouldn’t prescribe the other drugs, but it wouldn’t be his first choice, and you’d have to bug him to change your prescription because he wouldn’t think of doing it.

    Anyway, your sunscreen premise is valid, but any guy who’s getting a second chance at hot sex probably isn’t too concerned about sunscreen anymore. 🙂 They’re doin’ it in the backyard, on the beach, on the boat, in the trees, on the roof, etc. etc. That is if you don’t mind waiting over an hour for the pill to kick in.

    Oh, and on that subject, why has there been so little attention or press regarding the latest ED drug, Stendra? It’s claim to fame is that it works in 15 minutes. Fifteen seconds would be ideal, but anything is better than an hour, I guess. (Sorry for the long rambling text…)

    Reply
    • Joe Cannon says

      April 29, 2015 at 5:05 am

      devodude, I had not heard they were pushing Viagra BPH. If they are, there is probably some research somewhere but I think at the end of the day, the pharm companies are looking to make more money. That’s not a bad thing if its done honestly. It’s just capitalism.

      I had not heard of Stendra either so thanks for the heads up on it. 🙂

      Reply
  2. James says

    August 23, 2014 at 7:34 pm

    You may want to read this. A statistical analysis shows that Viagra may have caused a 107% increase in men with melanoma. The sample pool in this study is basically all of the world. Much larger.
    http://www.viagramelanomaattorney.com/uv-sunburn-risk-vs-erectile-dysfunction-drugs/

    Reply
    • Joe Cannon says

      August 24, 2014 at 9:14 am

      James, I looked at your website also has a pictures of Cialis and Levitra. While these are also PD5 inhibitors, I’m not aware of any direct evidence of skin cancer with these medications. If you’ve seen published peer reviewed studies that involved Levitra or Cialis and skin cancer please let me know so I can update my review.

      I noticed that the screen shot you included from the Skin Cancer Foundation ( http://www.skincancer.org/skin-cancer-information/skin-cancer-facts ) does not contain the words Viagra but rather just gives stats on skin cancer. I searched the Skin Cancer Foundation website for “Viagra” today, but couldn’t not find anything on it at their website.

      A statistical analysis of the link between Viagra and skin cancer, while valuable, is not the same thing as direct proof. I hope I’m right and you’re wrong about this but lets see what studies show moving forward.

      I think we can both agree that men should be wearing sunscreen whether they use viagra or not.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Chondroitin Sulfate Prostate Cancer Review: Is It Real? | SupplementClarity.com says:
    July 26, 2018 at 2:57 pm

    […] some research only hints that elevations in chrondroitin sulfate may have a connection to prostate cancer. Remember, chrondroitin sulfate is made naturally in the […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About

I'm Joe Cannon. I hold an MS in exercise science and a BS in chemistry and biology.

I've been quoted in the New York Times and Daily Beast to name a few. I've even lectured to the NASA community.

I'm the author of the first book on rhabdomyolysis (rhabdo) & exercise. I've conducted over 1,000 fitness certification classes.

Learn more about me

Get My Free Newsletters

Fitness Professioals Guide To Muscle Anatomy

Fitness Professionals Guide To Musculoskeletal Anatomy and Human Movementhttps://amzn.to/4aRi7ki

Categories

  • Certifications (27)
  • Exercise (38)
  • Health (42)
  • Interviews (10)
  • Nutrition (17)
  • Personal Trainer (52)
  • Podcast (98)
  • Product Reviews (38)
  • Rhabdo Articles (19)
  • Websites (9)




Rhabdo Book

  • rhabdo-bookhttps://amzn.to/47BtjPd

Personal Trainer Practice Test

https://joe-cannon.com/product/personal-trainer-practice-test-300-exam-questions-educate-challange-anyone-4th-edition-edition/personal trainer practice test

NASM PT Book

NASM PT Bookhttps://amzn.to/3RTkRVK

Privacy Policy

Credentials

Joe Cannon, MS has written for several publications including The Journal of Strength and Conditioning, Today's Dietitian, and Prevention. He's been quoted in the New York Times, lectured to NASA and has been a content consultant for Dateline NBC. He's the author of the first book ever published on rhabdomyolysis and exercise. Joe Cannon, has a BS in Chemistry and Biology and a MS in Exercise Science. He is a Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist (CSCS) and a personal trainer certified by the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA).
  Copyright © 2013 - 2025 Joe Cannon ·  Built by Varick Design

Copyright © 2025 · Joe Cannon on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in